| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This directory was created in commit 4c46c80, but its contents haven't
been linted with `vint` until now.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This ensures that new plugin code gets tested before being released.
We don't add the new vim/doc directory, as it's plain text rather than
VimL.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Use a positive list of things to check rather than just excluding
`bundle`; it's a little clearer what it's doing that way, and easier to
add paths to check rather than paths to exclude.
We also correctly leverage `vint` accepting multiple arguments, like
`shellcheck`.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
I forgot that the `lint` tools here need to check the *built* files, and
that that's the reason the `perlcritic` check against the source .pl
file was failing.
While it's still true that it would be preferable to test the files
found in a deterministic order, this branch's attempt to address that
issue is pretty much nonsense and can be abandoned.
This reverts commit 196155499c04b2c2050302e6575f1bcbbed052f1.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Using find(1) to run the appropriate lint program over a set of files
allows us to be terse and deal a little more dynamically with new files
placed in the directories, but the downsides are that it's error-prone
and that the order of testing is not predictable, and we'd ideally like
the testing to be a little more deterministic than that.
Case in point: writing the code for this commit unintentionally
uncovered a longstanding issue where the URxvt Perl script `select.pl`
was actually not being checked at all, due to an unneeded exclamation
mark inverting the `-name` test for `*.pl` files. `select.pl` is
presently not passing `perlcritic --brutal` on my machine, and likely
has not been compliant since as early as commit 5000365 in March this
year:
>commit 500036564541ff2d65a7b2f6f6f556202d72d6ce
>Author: Tom Ryder <tom@sanctum.geek.nz>
>Date: Fri Mar 24 11:01:05 2017
>
> Lots of Makefile tidying
>
> ...
> * Favour find(1) calls over shell loops
> ...
This commit also more clearly delineates between the language being
"linted" and the target for which it's being linted. The latter is
likely more desirable. This needs clarification.
|
|
|
Since I know there's a usable tool for this now in vim-vint, I may as
well make a target for my own convenience later.
Updated the README.markdown documentation of the `lint-*` targets,
restructuring the paragraph into a nested list for clarity. Also updated
the `dotfiles(7)` manual page to reflect those changes.
|
