From 57daf35a76506de41dfaf94af78376717943957b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Ryder <tom@sanctum.geek.nz>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 22:58:25 +1200
Subject: Move exm(1df) test into EDITOR selection

Merely checking for vim(1) is a poor test; we specifically need to know
if the ex(1) implementation is Vim, so test it while making the EDITOR
decision.
---
 bin/exm.sh | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

(limited to 'bin/exm.sh')

diff --git a/bin/exm.sh b/bin/exm.sh
index 25e3006f..378b5baf 100644
--- a/bin/exm.sh
+++ b/bin/exm.sh
@@ -1,12 +1,9 @@
 # Prevent Vim's ex(1) implementation from clearing the screen
 if [ -t 0 ] ; then
-    ver=$(ex --version 2>/dev/null | awk 'NR==1{print $1;exit}')
-    case $ver in
-        # Lie to Vim; tell it it's a dumb terminal, and that its required "cm"
-        # feature is invoked with a carriage return.
-        VIM)
-            cmd=$(printf 'set t_cm=\r|')
-            set -- -T dumb --cmd "${cmd%|}" "$@" ;;
-    esac
+
+    # Lie to Vim; tell it it's a dumb terminal, and that its required "cm"
+    # feature is invoked with a carriage return.
+    cmd=$(printf 'set t_cm=\r|')
+    set -- -T dumb --cmd "${cmd%|}" "$@"
 fi
 exec ex "$@"
-- 
cgit v1.2.3